Project Valkyrie

By Kelly Schoof
When
you were growing up did you ever wish to own a really exotic car? Maybe a Ferrari, Lamborghini or
Porsche? If you started to become a car
nut in your teens you probably realized something: people that have those cars
usually have a lot of money but often have no idea what is under the hood or
how it works. So most of us real car
nuts came to a conclusion: either we have to make about $200K more in a year or
find different performance cars to own.
Not willing to sacrifice power to weight ratio, most of us red blooded
North American guys went for the muscle cars, which is great. It’s even better when you can teach the rich
kid in the sports car a lesson at the lights with your Javelin or ‘Cuda. However, by the time you roll up to the next
set of lights the other guy challenges you to start the race at 120 mph or
maybe go for a road course type race.
This is where most of us run
out of cards to play. Even though our
muscle cars make their Porsches look silly in the ¼ mile, we start to run out
of options around 140mph - especially if there are tight corners involved.
Several
years ago I was inspired by a fellow named Rick Ehrenberg. Rick is the technical editor of Mopar Action
magazine (http://www.moparaction.com/Tech/index.html). He put together a team and a car, an
unlikely car at that, to compete at the One Lap of America event. They used a 1969 Valiant
(http://www.onelapofamerica.com/History/1997/OneLap1997frm.htm) with a
(Mopar) 360 crate motor, did some modifications, won their class and came
fourth place against the kind of big dollar cars I’m talking about. Chrysler engineers did not intend the
Valiant to be a race car, in fact, Rick and his team referred to it as the
‘Brick’. However, with some special
parts and the genius of Mr. Ehrenberg, it kept pace with the big buck, ‘high
tech’ machines. Since I started
following his success, it has become a dream and long term goal of mine to
enter a competition like One Lap of America, but first I need a car.
I
have decided to embark on a project of ridiculous proportions (at least for me)
that will create a performance car that will take on those exotics head to head
and beyond. After consulting with a
number of close friends, family and acquaintances, with experience ranging from
the local garage, speed shop, AMC club, to some people currently working in the
automotive engineering field; we believe the goal is achievable. The proposal was met with great enthusiasm
from all of these individuals; many of them have offered their help and
expertise to complete this project - I’ll be calling you guys soon … you know
who you are! The late night pizza is on
me.
We
want to create a car for low dollars that will beat the best and we are going
to accomplish that buy doing the engineering and fabrication our selves. Besides, someone once said ‘all we ask is
blood, sweat, and gears’; so why not?
After all, if you want it done right you have to do it yourself! Right?
A good friend of mine recently told me that the problem with a large
project like this is that it takes so much of your thought, time and money that
when it’s all over you don’t know what to do with yourself. Well I don’t know about rest of you, but I’m
sure we’ll figure out what to do with the car when we’re done. I have decided to call this project and the
car that is born from it “Valkyrie”.
What
is a ‘Valkyrie’ you ask? Well the
Valkyries come from Norse mythology.
They were warrior goddesses in service to the supreme god Oden. Some of you may recall the classical music
piece ‘Ride of the Valkyries’ written by Richard Wagner in 1856. More recently, a very impressive mach 3
strategic bomber prototype referred to as the ‘Valkyrie XB-70’ was built by
North American Aviation in the early 1960s.
For those of us building, the Valkyrie might seem like a lot of work,
but, as my friend also said about a project like this ‘truly, the fun is
getting there’.

A side view of Valkyrie shows the rear quarter vent door, new fuel cap location and the side scoop for rear brake cooling
The
platform for Valkyrie is the 1974 – 1978 AMC Matador Coupe; specifically, the
one that will be used is a 1977 model.
Since AMC engineers and the Penske racing team designed the Matador as a
race car for NASCAR racing, rather than a passenger car being converted to race
car, there are many design features of the Matador platform that are conducive
to this kind of performance. The wind
tunnel designed body, unequal length double wishbone front suspension and the
multi link rear suspension are great starting points for such a car. The
cavernous rear wheel wells the Matador was equipped with speak of one thing:
NASCAR sized tires. The AMC power
plants, although requiring some modifications to their oiling system
configuration, have some of the best breathing heads in the industry, making
the high RPM capabilities which are beneficial in road course racing easier to
achieve.
AMC
incorporated several features in the Matador bodies that simply make
sense. The flush/integrated rain sill
over the windows, the flush door handles, the hide-away wipers all clean the
car up from a styling and aerodynamic stand point. The wiper arms even have integrated window washer jets that move
as the wiper arm moves; this results in a consistent spray pattern that is not
effected by wind velocity as it is the problem with most cars. However, there
were some design aerodynamic features that engineers had to exclude in order to
make the car cost effective and practical for public sale. The headlight assembly and rear quarter
windows are such examples. So, in the
interest of aerodynamics, functionality and maybe just for the sake of doing
something different, a number of body modifications are planned. The headlight assembly will be remolded and
smoothed back to reduce drag, and for the same reason, the rear quarter window
will be removed. In place of the rear
window, a flush mounted, opening and closing, reverse vent will be installed. This will aid in drawing air from the front
cowl vents, crossing the occupant’s legs and upper body to exit the car in just
behind the side window. Intake scoops
on the hood will feed the engine’s supercharger, while scoops on the side of
the car will duct air to the rear brakes.
Cooling to the front brakes will be provided through ducting from the
front air dam. Consider the possible
weight advantage by manufacturing the entire front clip’s skin from composites;
not only would dramatically reduce the weight of those components, but it would
aid in further improving Matador’s [already good] front to rear weight
distribution.
A
rear wing of some type will likely have to be added to create enough down force
to keep the car glued to the track at high speeds. The wing should variable
geometry so that the down force can be made to match the occasion. However, it may be advantageous to make the
wing removable with the replacement of the trunk lid. Thus one can avoid the jeers and sneers of being associated with
the rice boy crowd when driving public roads.


The suspension configuration will remain in the
configuration that AMC engineers intended, however the ride height will be
reduced. Polyurethane bushings will
replace all OEM rubber bushings and the sway bar diameters will be increased
from the stock 15/16” to 1 5/16”. All
the suspension control arms will be boxed in for better strength and stability
to withstand repeated high loading. The
front brake rotors will be increased from 11” vented to 12” vented and the
10”x3” drums will be converted to 11” vented disks. The solid AMC model 20 rear axle will be replaced with a Chrysler
8 ¾” unit with removable carrier differential.
This unit is strong, lighter than the model 20 and offers axle ratio
changes in about 30 minutes time.
It
would likely be wise to change the OEM 15X7” rims to 19x8” aluminum alloy rims
in the front and 19x9.5” in the rear there by reducing the side wall height and
associated side wall roll over. Good
candidates would be 245-40R19 and 305-50R19 in the rear. It is possible that other tire and rim
combinations could be used, however the overall rim diameter will likely remain
between 17 to 19”.
Body
rigidity is going to be key issue in achieving the handling characteristics we
expect. The unibody will have to be
stiffened to reflect the types of repeated loading that the car will be
subjected to and help the suspension maintain its geometry under duress. Subframe connectors will be must and a six
point roll cage attached to the subframes.
The number of welds in the unibody will be increased to add stiffness;
in some cases seams will likely be welded solid. However, there is a balancing act that must be performed when it
comes to welding in braces: too much bracing with out graduation can cause
stress concentrations. This in turn can
lead to body cracking and a far worse situation than if the car was left
stock. There is no doubt that caution
will have to exercised along with regular chassis/structural inspections while
the car is in use.
Consider
some interior changes such as changing the car from a 2+2 to strictly a 2
seater. Who needs a back seat in a race
car any way? A rear seat just adds weight and takes away usable space. A five point race harness would keep the
driver and passenger in place during violent maneuvers. It would be nice to include a heads up
display that would enable the driver to keep track of vital information such as
speed, RPM, oil pressure and coolant temperature without taking his eyes off
the road.
While
the exact engine configuration is not set in stone yet, it will likely be a
5.6L (343 cid) V8 with forged pistons, forged rods, and forged crank. One thing is pretty well for sure, the mill
will have a 3.28” stroke so it can reach the revs without grenading. It will also be equipped with a disengaging
clutched Paxton or Vortec supercharger producing about 7 psi boost. Some computer dyno simulations with this
configuration have been done. The results are: 570hp at 7000rpm and 545ft-lbs
at 3200rpm. Although these preliminary
results are likely not 100% accurate, we are fairy confident the numbers are
within 10% of reality. By the way, the
simulation showed this motor only lost 10ft-lbs of torque all the way from
3200rpm up to 5500rpm. Gotta love a
blower!
Transmission
choices are numerous, but it is likely best to choose one that will offer more
than just three speeds as is the case with the most common automatics. We feel that a manual gearbox is pretty well
a must for Valkyrie. There are several
choices even in the manual category.
While options are plentiful some important factors must enter the
decision making process. Issues such as
reliability, must be carefully balanced with cost and performance. Either a 5 speed TKO with overdrive or a
Richmond 6 speed are distinct possibilities.
No final decision has been made as to which one at this point, however,
due to the favorable durability reports on the TKO and its attractive price it
is likely the best choice.
You
may ask what the drivability of such a car will be like after all these
changes. Well, your Acura will still be
the car to take when performing such pedestrian tasks as getting groceries for
the weekend BBQ. Valkyrie, on the other
hand, is intended not only to turn heads, but perform as a touring/race car
over long periods, all at a cost minimum.

Raised edges along each side of the back window and trunk
add a new stance and will integrate with a removable wing.
One
of the main targets is to keep the Valkyrie drivable and durable. Being drivable as a touring car is where my
current 401 powered Matador Coupe falls down – it’s more of a high-octane fuel
sucking, tire smokin’, kill ‘em off the line weekend blaster. Being endurance reliable and able to run on
87 octane pump fuel is a must for Valkyrie.
This is where the disengaging clutch on the super charger comes in. Valkyrie’s 5.6L motor will have a
compression ratio of 8.25:1.0, one of the lower ratios seen in any domestic
production engine in the past 45 years.
However, this should help her to run on 87 octane and cruise, with the
supercharger turned off, just like any other car on the road, i.e. it won’t
cost you fortune to drive this car across 3 states and back. When it’s time to use the supercharger,
better fuel or an octane enhancer will be added to avoid
knocking/detonation. The Supercharger
will be engaged with the press of a button located on the gear shifter and the
system will be armed with a switch on the console. In the economy mode, the highway fuel consumption target is 20
mpg on the 87 octane fuel. This is not
out of line with what I once got in a stock 360 Matador coupe. Obviously Valkyrie will not perform the
same in economy mode as with the blower on.
On the other hand, the guy in the Porsche has no choice but to spend his
money on 92 octane fuel – we do!
Valkyrie’s
suspension will be harsher than most cars sold today, and one will have to be
careful of speed bumps, pot holes and high parking barriers, however such is
life with any sports car. Since AMC
decided to make the trunk of the Matador Coupe with ample room, this will carry
over to the Valkyrie with one minor exception.
Your touring luggage will have to share the space with the car’s
battery, which must be relocated from the engine bay to the trunk. No worries about sulfuric acid on your
Armani suit though, the battery will be in it’s own sealed and externally
vented compartment. The absence of a
rear seat will open the car up for possibility of an improved sound system and
more room to recline the form fitted bucket seats if you need a nap – while
you’re stopped that is.
Of
course the entire point of all these changes being made is for one reason:
performance. The following are some
basic performance targets and specs for the Valkyrie to meet or better:
0-60mph
(0-100kmph): 4.5
seconds
¼
mile: 12.8 seconds
Form
60mph (100kmph): 130ft
(39.6m)
Top
Speed: 180mph
(289kmph)
High
g-force cornering
characteristics:
Mild under steer
Speed
through 700 foot slalom: 65mph (104kmph)
Skid
pad: .95g
General data
Layout: Front engine/rear drive
Body: Unit
body
Fuel
capacity: 24
us gallons (109L)
Wheel
base: 114
in. (289cm)
Track
Front/Rear: 62.0/62.0
in. (157/157cm)
Steering: Recirculating
ball, power assist, variable ratio, 2.7 turns lock to lock
Front suspension: Unequal length
upper and lower wishbone, coil springs/adjustable shock, adjustable sway bar,
polyurethane bushings
Rear suspension: Four trailing
links: upper and lower control arms, live axle, coil springs/adjustable shocks,
sway bar, polyurethane bushings
Useable
trunk space (est.): 16.0
cu ft
Curb
Weight: 1496kg
(3300lbs)
Weight
distribution Front/Rear: 53/47
Power
to weight ratio: 5.7lbs/hp
Type OHV V8
Bore: 4.08”
Stroke: 3.28”
Displacement:
343 cu in (5.6L)
Output: 570hp @ 7000rpm
540 ft-lbs @ 3200rpm
Redline:
7500 rpm
Mean
Piston Speed @ Redline: 76 ft/sec (4573ft/min)
Induction Forced, centrifugal
supercharger
Carburetion: Carter
Thermoquad, 4V (later: Accel multi port gen 7 programable fuel injection
Intake
manifold: Edlebrock,
Torker
Enhancements: Water injection
Crank: Armasteel
or Forged (preferably forged)
Rods: Ford
300 six cylinder, forged
Pistons: Feather weight, forged aluminum
Stud
girdle: Custom
made
Intake
valve: Stainless
Steel, 2.02”
Exhaust
valve: Stainless
Steel, 1.65”
Lifters: Roller
hydraulic
Rockers: Full
Roller, 1.6:1.0 ratio
Cam Roller, stock
AMC valve timing, enhanced lift (custom grind)
Timing
Chain: Double
roller
Heads: 58
cc AMC, ported polished.
Oil
pump: High
volume,
Oil
pan: 7
quart, windage screen, crank scraper
Pick
up: Swivel
type
Oil
Distribution: auxiliary crank feed, enlarged
return passages
Radiator: Aluminum,
4 core
Fan: Electric,
thermostatically controlled
Ignition: MSD
6AL, crank pickup, 8mm solid core wires, Delco RX44 plugs
Transmission: TKO 5
speed W/ OD, or Richmond 6 speed W/ OD
Drive
axle: Mopar
8 ¾” w/ removable carrier and posi-traction
Speedometer: 200 mph
Tachometer: 9000rpm
Oil
pressure: pressure
tube type gauge
Oil
temperature: bordon
tube type gauge
Coolant
temperature: bordon
tube type gauge
Electrical
system: Voltmeter,
Ammeter
Manifold
Pressure: vacuum/boost
gauge
Fuel: stock
gauge
The
component collection for this project has begun; most importantly, the car for
this project while rough in appearance is secured and in a safe place – see the
picture below. This project is very
involved and will no doubt be time consuming.
Building many of the components will not start until late 2003. The bulk of this project will likely take
place the following 2 or 3 years beyond that.

Rough, but in better shape than a lot of cars
that have sat outside that long.
There
will undoubtedly be changes to the configuration that is described here. We will have future articles featuring
pictures and descriptions of progress and component construction.
Forthcoming
updates will include a cost projection of Valkyrie and an article on making the
oversize sway bar. Stay tuned if you
don’t value your sanity!